DOL Wage & Hour Examination Checklist
A 40-point compliance checklist organized by the 29 CFR sections DOL Wage and Hour Division investigators examine. For each item, the documentation standard is noted — what the investigator will ask for and what the organization needs to produce.
Official sources
Use DOL and eCFR pages for current wage-and-hour rules and regulatory text.
The DOL Wage and Hour Division (WHD) enforces the FLSA, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Davis-Bacon Act, and several other federal wage laws. Investigations typically begin with a complaint — from an employee, former employee, or advocacy organization — though WHD also conducts targeted industry investigations.
Investigation Triggers
| Trigger | Common focus |
|---|---|
| Employee complaint (Form WH-3) | Overtime miscalculation; improper exempt classification; off-the-clock work |
| Former employee complaint (termination-related) | Final paycheck timing; PTO payout obligations; retaliation claims |
| Industry initiative (low-wage, hospitality, agriculture) | Tip credit; minimum wage; child labor |
| Misclassification initiative | IC vs. employee; joint employer analysis |
| Referral from IRS or state agency | Related to tax examination or UI fraud investigation |
Salary Level Test
Executive Exemption Duties Test
Administrative Exemption Duties Test
Professional Exemption Duties Test (Learned)
FLSA record-keeping requirements apply to non-exempt employees. Exempt employees have reduced requirements. Records must be retained — no specific format is required, but they must be accurate and accessible for WHD inspection.
| Age | Permissible hours (school in session) | Restrictions |
|---|---|---|
| Under 14 | Not permitted in most non-agricultural employment | Very limited exceptions: acting, babysitting, family business |
| 14–15 | Max 3 hrs/day; 18 hrs/week; 8am–7pm (9pm summer) | Permitted in retail, food service, clerical; prohibited from hazardous jobs |
| 16–17 | No hour restrictions | Cannot work hazardous occupations (17 prohibited HOs) |
| 18+ | No restrictions under federal child labor law | State law may be more restrictive |
The DOL uses the "economic reality test" (not the IRS common law test) to determine whether a worker is economically dependent on the employer (employee) or is truly in business for themselves (independent contractor). The 2024 Final Rule (effective March 11, 2024) restored the multifactor totality-of-circumstances analysis.
| Factor | Indicates employee | Indicates IC | 29 CFR Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opportunity for profit/loss | No opportunity to profit or lose based on own decisions | Can profit or lose based on managerial skill | §795.110(b)(1) |
| Investment in tools/facilities | Employer provides all tools and equipment | Significant investment in own tools; not reimbursed | §795.110(b)(2) |
| Permanency of relationship | Indefinite or continuous relationship | Defined project; non-exclusive; sporadic | §795.110(b)(3) |
| Degree of control | Employer sets schedule, supervises closely, controls methods | Worker sets own hours, controls methods | §795.110(b)(4) |
| Integral to business | Work is critical to employer's regular business | Work is peripheral; not core function | §795.110(b)(5) |
| Skill and initiative | Work requires little specialized skill; worker doesn't exercise business initiative | Specialized skills + exercises independent business judgment | §795.110(b)(6) |
| Item | Federal requirement | Documentation needed |
|---|---|---|
| Tip credit notice | Employer must inform employee of tip credit before taking it | Written notice to employee; signed acknowledgment recommended |
| Tip credit amount | Max $5.12/hr (federal cash wage min. $2.13/hr) | Payroll records showing cash wage + tips = at least federal minimum wage |
| Tip pooling | Permitted among employees who customarily receive tips; employers and managers cannot participate | Written tip pool agreement; distribution records |
| Dual jobs | Tip credit applies only during tipped work — not "side work" exceeding 20% of time or 30 continuous minutes | Time records distinguishing tipped vs. non-tipped duties |
| Credit card tips | Must be paid by next regular payday; employer may deduct credit card processing fee pro-rata | Records of tip amounts and payment dates |
The Consumer Credit Protection Act (CCPA) limits how much of an employee's wages can be garnished each workweek. These limits apply to all creditor garnishments, tax levies, and child support orders. Violation exposes the employer to civil liability and contempt of court.
Disposable Earnings — The Definition That Matters
What Reduces Disposable Earnings (Legally Required Deductions)
- Federal income tax withholding required by law (the minimum withholding based on the employee's W-4 status)
- State and local income tax withholding required by state law
- FICA taxes (Social Security and Medicare) — always mandatory
- State unemployment insurance (employee portion where applicable)
- Deductions required by court order that have priority over the current garnishment (e.g., a child support order with higher priority)
What Does NOT Reduce Disposable Earnings
- Voluntary deductions — health insurance, 401(k), FSA, union dues, parking, charitable contributions
- Wage assignments to which the employee consented
- Repayments of employer loans
- Uniform deductions
- Additional federal income tax withholding elected under W-4 Step 4(c) — see next section
| Garnishment type | Maximum withholding (per workweek) | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Creditor garnishment | Lesser of: (1) 25% of disposable earnings, OR (2) amount by which disposable earnings exceed 30 × federal minimum wage ($7.25 × 30 = $217.50/week) | 15 USC §1673(a) |
| Child support / alimony (supporting another family) | 50% of disposable earnings | 15 USC §1673(b)(2)(A) |
| Child support / alimony (not supporting another family) | 60% of disposable earnings | 15 USC §1673(b)(2)(B) |
| Child support — 12+ weeks in arrears | Add 5% to above (55% or 65%) | 15 USC §1673(b)(2) |
| Federal tax levy (IRS Form 668-W) | Exempt amount based on filing status and dependents; remainder is levied — no CCPA percentage limit | IRC §6334 |
| State tax levy | Varies by state; must comply with CCPA minimum protections | State law + CCPA |
| Student loan | 15% of disposable earnings; may not reduce below 30 × minimum wage | 20 USC §1095a |
| Chapter 13 bankruptcy | As ordered by bankruptcy court; CCPA protections apply | 11 USC §1325 |
Disposable Earnings Calculation Example
Gross wages: $1,200/week
Less: Federal income tax withholding (required): $120
Less: State income tax withholding (required): $48
Less: Social Security (6.2%): $74.40
Less: Medicare (1.45%): $17.40
Disposable earnings: $1,200 − $120 − $48 − $74.40 − $17.40 = $940.20
CCPA limit (lesser of): (1) 25% × $940.20 = $235.05, or (2) $940.20 − $217.50 = $722.70
Maximum withholding: $235.05
Note: Health insurance ($80/week) and 401(k) ($60/week) are NOT subtracted — they are voluntary and do not reduce disposable earnings.
Garnishment Priority
When multiple garnishment orders exist simultaneously, the order of priority matters:
- Child support and alimony orders always take priority over creditor garnishments — regardless of which was received first
- Federal tax levies (IRS 668-W) generally have priority over creditor garnishments but are subordinate to existing child support orders
- Multiple creditor garnishments are processed in the order received — once the CCPA maximum is reached, subsequent creditors receive nothing that pay period
- State law may impose stricter limits or modify priority — always verify state-specific rules
This is one of the most misunderstood intersections in payroll compliance. Employees who are subject to wage garnishments sometimes elect additional federal income tax withholding on W-4 Step 4(c) — believing it will reduce their take-home pay (and therefore reduce the garnishment amount). It does not.
Why Employees Believe Otherwise (and Why They're Wrong)
An employee with a creditor garnishment might reason: "If I withhold an extra $200/week voluntarily, my net pay drops by $200, so the court can only garnish based on lower take-home pay." This reasoning confuses net pay with disposable earnings under the CCPA.
| Scenario | Disposable earnings | Garnishment max (25%) | Employee's net pay after garnishment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard W-4 (no extra withholding) | $940.20 | $235.05 | $940.20 − $235.05 = $705.15 |
| W-4 Step 4(c): +$200 extra withholding | $940.20 (unchanged) | $235.05 (unchanged) | $940.20 − $235.05 − $200 extra tax = $505.15 |
The employee's net pay is $200 lower — but the garnishment amount is identical. The extra withholding goes to the IRS, not back to the employee. The employee has effectively made themselves poorer without reducing the garnishment.
The Correct Calculation Flow in PeopleSoft
- Calculate gross wages — regular + overtime + all compensation
- Subtract legally required deductions only — FICA, required federal withholding, required state/local withholding. The "required" federal withholding is the amount computed from the W-4 filing status and allowances/steps — not the inflated amount including Step 4(c)
- = Disposable earnings
- Apply CCPA percentage limit to disposable earnings
- Withhold garnishment
- Then withhold all other deductions — including the Step 4(c) additional amount — from what remains
Does Additional Withholding Protect Against an IRS Levy?
An IRS tax levy (Form 668-W) operates differently from a creditor garnishment. The IRS levy exempts a calculated amount based on filing status and dependents — the remainder is taken regardless. Additional W-4 withholding does not reduce an IRS levy amount either; if anything, higher withholding earlier in the year may reduce the balance owed to the IRS and prevent a levy from being issued in the first place — but once a 668-W is in effect, the additional withholding election is irrelevant to the levy calculation.
Employer Liability for Incorrect Garnishment Calculation
If the employer withholds too little from the employee's wages to satisfy the garnishment order, the employer may be held in contempt of court and personally liable for the amount that should have been withheld. The CCPA does not allow the employer to reduce the garnishment because the employee has elected higher voluntary withholding. Document your garnishment calculation methodology in writing.
Salary Basis — Improper Deductions That Destroy Exempt Status
The salary basis test is forfeited — not just for the employee affected, but potentially for all employees in the same job category in the same establishment — if the employer makes improper deductions. Common improper deductions:
| Deduction | Permissible? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Full-day absence for personal reasons | Yes | 29 CFR §541.602(b)(1) |
| Full-day absence for sickness (under bona fide sick leave plan) | Yes | 29 CFR §541.602(b)(2) |
| Partial-day absence (half day) | No | Destroys salary basis — must pay full day for any partial day worked |
| Deduction for safety rule violation | Yes | 29 CFR §541.602(b)(4) — bona fide safety rule required |
| Deduction for jury duty or witness fees offset | Yes | 29 CFR §541.602(b)(3) |
| Deduction for FMLA leave (partial day) | Yes | 29 CFR §541.602(b)(7) — FMLA leave is a specific exception |
| Deduction for first/last week partial week of employment | Yes | 29 CFR §541.602(b)(6) |
| Deduction for PTO exhaustion (no accrued leave, partial day) | No | If no leave available, full salary must be paid for any day any work is performed |
| Deduction for equipment damage or cash shortage | No | Reduces salary below guaranteed level — destroys exemption |
Regular Rate Traps — Non-Discretionary vs. Discretionary Bonuses
Whether a bonus must be included in the regular rate for overtime purposes turns on whether it was promised or expected:
| Bonus type | In regular rate? | Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Production / piece-rate bonus announced in advance | Yes | Non-discretionary — must be included; retroactively increase regular rate |
| Attendance bonus (perfect attendance reward) | Yes | Non-discretionary — conditions are defined in advance |
| Safety bonus (specific targets announced) | Yes | Non-discretionary — targets create expectation |
| True discretionary bonus (no prior promise, amount discretionary) | No | 29 CFR §778.211 — employer retains full discretion on amount and payment |
| Christmas / holiday bonus (paid annually regardless of performance) | No | Gifts — excludable if not tied to hours, production, or efficiency |
| Signing bonus | No | One-time payment not tied to hours worked — excludable |
Joint Employer Liability
Two or more employers can be jointly liable for FLSA violations when both benefit from an employee's work and share control. Common joint employer situations:
- Staffing agency workers — the host employer may be a joint employer responsible for FLSA compliance even though the agency is the W-2 employer
- Franchise arrangements — depending on control exercised by the franchisor over franchisee employees
- Subcontractor arrangements — particularly in construction and agriculture
- Gig economy platforms exercising significant behavioral control over workers
On-Call and Remote Work Edge Cases
| Situation | Compensable? | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| Employee required to stay at workplace and wait for assignment | Yes | 29 CFR §785.15 — "engaged to wait" |
| Employee at home, on call, paged infrequently, can engage in personal activities | No | 29 CFR §785.17 — "waiting to be engaged" |
| Employee at home, on call, required to respond within 5 minutes, called frequently | Yes | Restrictions so severe that employee cannot use time effectively for personal activities |
| Remote employee working beyond scheduled hours (employer unaware) | Yes | 29 CFR §785.11 — suffered or permitted work; employer "should have known" |
| Employee checks email after hours occasionally | Depends | De minimis doctrine may apply for truly trivial amounts; trend is toward compensability for regular after-hours contact |
| Security screening at start/end of shift (for employer's benefit) | Yes | Integral and indispensable — compensable if mandatory and for employer's benefit |
Fluctuating Workweek — When It Goes Wrong
The fluctuating workweek (FWW) method allows overtime at a "half-time" rate rather than "time-and-a-half" for non-exempt employees paid a fixed salary when hours genuinely vary. Traps that invalidate the FWW method:
- Hours do not actually fluctuate — employee works a predictable schedule (e.g., always 45 hours)
- The salary does not cover all hours worked in all workweeks (i.e., the effective hourly rate sometimes falls below minimum wage)
- The employee is not paid the same salary in weeks with fewer than 40 hours
- The method is used without a clear mutual understanding between employer and employee
- State law prohibits FWW — California, Alaska, and several other states do not permit the FWW method; time-and-a-half is always required
Commissioned Employees — Regular Rate Pitfalls
For employees paid on commission plus base salary, the regular rate must be recalculated each week to include the commission. If commissions are paid monthly or quarterly, the regular rate must be retroactively recalculated and any additional overtime owed must be paid promptly. Using a fixed "commission allocation" rather than actual earned commission for overtime purposes is a common — and expensive — FLSA violation.
Agricultural Exemptions
Agricultural workers are partially exempt from FLSA overtime requirements under §213(b)(12). However, minimum wage protections generally apply (with limited exceptions for small farms). Child labor rules differ significantly for agriculture — 12-year-olds may work on farms with parental consent. WHD has a dedicated agriculture enforcement program; do not assume standard FLSA rules apply to farmworkers.
State Law Interaction — Where Federal Minimums Are Not Enough
| Area | Federal floor | State law note |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum wage | $7.25/hr | 30+ states and many localities have higher minimum wages — the higher rate always applies |
| Overtime threshold | 40 hours/workweek | California requires OT after 8 hours/day; some states have additional double-time requirements |
| Creditor garnishment limits | 25% of disposable earnings or 30× min. wage excess | Texas, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, South Carolina prohibit most creditor garnishments; many states have lower limits |
| Final paycheck timing | Next regular pay date | Many states require immediate payment on termination or within 24–72 hours; California imposes immediate payment + 30-day waiting time penalty |
| Predictive scheduling | No federal requirement | Chicago, NYC, San Francisco, Seattle, Oregon have predictive scheduling laws requiring advance notice and premium pay for schedule changes |
| Remedy | Amount | Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Back wages | All unpaid minimum wage and overtime (2-year lookback; 3 years if willful) | Any minimum wage or overtime violation |
| Liquidated damages | Equal to back wages (100%) | Default unless employer proves good faith + reasonable grounds |
| Civil money penalties — child labor | Up to $10,000 per violation; up to $15,138 per violation causing serious injury/death | Child labor violations (indexed annually) |
| Civil money penalties — repeated/willful violations | Up to $1,000 per violation (§16(e)) | Willful or repeated minimum wage/overtime violations |
| Injunctive relief | Court order prohibiting future violations; ongoing monitoring | Pattern of violations; egregious cases |
| Criminal prosecution | Fine and/or imprisonment up to 6 months | Willful violation of FLSA; second conviction |